Define the attribution question

Decide whether the team wants to know the first known touch, the final step before enquiry or content that assisted evaluation. These are different views of the same journey. No single model automatically establishes which interaction caused the customer to act.

Prevent double counting

Keep unique enquiries and customers separate from content-assisted events. If three articles contributed to one journey, the business still received one enquiry. Explain the reporting method so article-level totals are not added together and presented as more customers than actually arrived.

Combine data with customer feedback

Ask relevant prospects what helped them understand the offer or make contact. Treat this feedback as another evidence source, with its own limitations. Use attribution to improve content and routing rather than to award every team the largest possible share of credit. Keep campaign tagging and internal navigation labels consistent. Inconsistent tags can fragment one source into several apparent channels, making attribution look more complex and preventing the team from comparing similar journeys over time. Review whether enquiry records merge repeat visits appropriately, so one person’s continued research does not accidentally inflate the number of unique prospects.

Imagine this

Illustrative operating example

A hypothetical prospect reads four guides and then submits one partnership enquiry. Each guide may be recorded as an assisted touch under a defined method, but the unique qualified-enquiry total remains one. Four assisted touches are not four leads.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.