Name the problem
Tell the assistant whether the draft was too vague, too long, inaccurate in role attribution or unsuitable for the audience. Provide the corrected facts and the intended effect. A request to make it better can produce stronger adjectives without solving the underlying issue. The revision brief should give the tool a concrete editorial task.
Compare the revision with the goal
Check whether the specific problem was resolved and whether new errors appeared. Keep useful wording from the first version where appropriate rather than replacing everything. The final profile content should be approved as a coherent whole. More drafts do not automatically produce more accurate copy; deliberate feedback and human review create the improvement.
Hypothetical scenario
A hypothetical founder rejects a biography because it overstates company scale. The second prompt supplies the accurate scope and asks for a confident but precise revision, which is checked against the original facts.
Make it practical.
Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.
