Frame the review question

A profile-linked review guide can explain whether feedback is sought on content accuracy, usability or a specific design choice. Ask reviewers to connect comments to the intended audience and task. Avoid presenting an exploratory draft as a final product awaiting only approval. The status of the work changes what feedback is useful.

Separate comments from decisions

Explain who collects feedback and how it will be considered. A person’s suggestion does not automatically become an agreed change. Keep the process clear so several reviewers do not create conflicting expectations. The resource can make collaboration more structured without promising that every preference will be implemented.

Imagine this

Hypothetical scenario

A hypothetical designer shares a draft project overview and asks reviewers to check factual accuracy before commenting on visual style. The guide explains that suggestions will be consolidated, preventing each comment from being treated as an approved change.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.