When the draft exposes a mismatch

Tap Tap Go brings biography, portfolio and business information into one professional story. Its intended AI assistance can help organise that story, but conflicting inputs still require an owner’s decision. If one document says director and another says adviser, do not ask the assistant to choose the more persuasive label. Identify the current role and the context in which each earlier description was used. The same applies to company names, project dates and descriptions of responsibility.

Give the assistant a settled brief

Create a short approved fact sheet before generating a revised introduction. Mark unresolved items as excluded rather than encouraging the assistant to infer an answer. Review the draft against that sheet, then check the public portfolio and linked company material for the same discrepancy. If a change affects existing readers, decide whether a visible clarification is needed. This workflow makes AI useful for expression after the underlying facts are settled, instead of using fluent prose to conceal uncertainty.

Imagine this

Hypothetical example

A professional’s old media kit lists a role that has since changed. Their AI-assisted biography mixes both titles into a misleading description. The professional confirms the current position, updates the source brief and then revises the profile, ensuring every public asset describes the same present responsibility.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

References & further reading

Tap Tap Go Journal: product context and editorial approach ↗

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.