Public credibility and private activity are different

A professional profile can display work, reviews and service information to help people understand a business. Financial transaction history serves a different purpose: reviewing the applicable activity record. The existence of both features does not mean financial details should be published as social proof. Avoid placing account screens, unrelated balances or customer movements inside a public portfolio merely to make the profile appear successful or commercially active.

Share only the context a recipient needs

If someone needs payment evidence, use the relevant provider's supported record and appropriate sharing process. Review what it contains and keep unnecessary information private. For a public case study, describe the professional outcome without exposing individual financial activity or inventing performance claims. This separation strengthens the ecosystem's usefulness: the profile helps people decide whether to engage, while transaction history helps authorised users understand financial events. Each feature can contribute to trust without turning confidential records into promotional decoration.

Imagine this

Hypothetical worked scene

In a hypothetical studio profile refresh, the founder considers adding a screenshot of recent payments to demonstrate demand. The team instead uses an authorised project story and keeps the financial record private. When an individual customer needs confirmation, the studio shares only the relevant approved evidence through the appropriate channel.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.