TAP TAP GO
Match frequency to action
Use frequent views for issues that require quick responses, such as service interruptions or campaign delivery problems. Review slower-moving outcomes, such as partner productivity or cohort retention, over intervals that allow meaningful evidence to emerge. Avoid reacting to noise simply because a metric updates daily.
Keep definitions consistent
Use the same underlying event definitions across daily, weekly and monthly reporting. Explain how summaries relate to each other. A weekly report should not quietly redefine a qualified customer compared with the dashboard the team uses every morning.
Design each meeting around a choice
State what decisions the report is meant to support and who can make them. Remove metrics that create discussion without affecting action. The aim is a reporting rhythm that improves judgement and accountability while leaving enough time for the team to execute. Give each meeting a short record of decisions and follow-up owners. This makes it possible to review whether the reporting cadence is improving action, rather than merely creating a recurring schedule of presentations that revisit the same unresolved issues.
Illustrative operating example
A hypothetical paid campaign needs daily delivery checks, weekly enquiry-quality review and a later assessment of customer activation. Judging all three on daily purchase fluctuations would mix operational monitoring with outcomes that need more time to develop.
Make it practical.
Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.
