Plan the transition

For each major claim in the presentation, identify the next evidence item a reviewer may request. Keep the introduction concise while making that route visible. Avoid stuffing the public deck with every supporting record. A clear statement that additional material is available through a defined process can be more useful than unreadable appendices.

Preserve the same vocabulary

Use matching project names, dates and metric definitions in the presentation and supporting pack. Explain any difference in scope between the two. Tap Tap Go can provide a convenient entry point to approved business information, but access to a profile does not complete diligence or verify an offering. The handoff should introduce the responsible contact and the next review step. This keeps the emotional strength of the story connected to information a serious reader can examine.

Put the guide to work

Create a short guide for the colleague who handles inbound interest after the presentation. They should know which evidence can be shared, which owner handles specialist questions and how to describe unresolved items. The story-to-evidence transition depends on people as well as document design.

Imagine this

Hypothetical example

A founder’s cinematic deck generates interest, but follow-up initially produces unrelated files. The team creates a matching evidence index using the same section names. Readers can move from the story to the underlying information without starting a new explanation from scratch.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.