Lead with material changes

List the changed document, the affected topic and the reason for the update. Distinguish a correction from additional evidence or a change in the business plan. Avoid a vague message saying the latest deck is attached. Include the version and date so recipients can identify the relevant file. Keep the explanation proportionate to the significance of the change.

Explain the consequence

State whether the update affects an earlier answer, an assumption or a requested next step. Identify any questions that remain open. Where a correction matters to an active decision, make that relationship explicit. Keep the update in the review record and ensure the maintained document destination points to the current version. The purpose is to help reviewers stay accurately informed, not create a constant stream of cosmetic announcements.

Put the guide to work

Keep a distribution note for material updates so the team knows which active reviewers received them. This avoids sending repeated generic reminders while missing someone whose decision depends on the correction. The record can be simple: recipient group, version and date communicated.

Imagine this

Hypothetical example

A company receives a revised implementation estimate after a partner review. Its update note identifies the affected timeline and explains which milestones moved. Recipients can assess the consequence without comparing two long decks line by line.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.