Define the evidence

When another website links to an article, inspect the paragraph around the link. Is it citing a useful checklist, discussing a disagreement, listing resources or reproducing promotional material? Record the context rather than treating every mention as equally valuable. A small relevant publication can send highly suitable readers, while a widely distributed link may have little connection to the audience you serve.

Make it operational

Keep a simple log with source page, linking text, destination article, relationship type and observed referral outcome where available. Do not infer endorsement if the source is critical or neutral. Check whether the reference remains live before using it in a public credibility claim. Use recurring citation patterns to decide which resources deserve improvement: a practical worksheet repeatedly cited for its method may be worth maintaining more carefully than a generic article that attracts many low-relevance mentions.

Imagine this

Hypothetical example

An industry association links to a document-access checklist as a useful operational resource. The journal records the exact context and checks whether visitors from that page make relevant enquiries. It describes the link as a resource reference, not as an endorsement of every product the company sells.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

References & further reading

Further reading: Search Console links report ↗

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.