TAP TAP GO
Describe the actual supplier relationship
A customer may want to settle an invoice after a supported conversion, but the future programme must specifically support that recipient relationship. A proposed own-account route would not automatically establish third-party supplier payments. The invoice, legal parties and destination conditions need to be explained accurately.
Avoid a shortcut in the product story
Show the conversion and proposed bank movement as separate stages with relevant partner responsibilities. Do not present the feature as universally available or use a hypothetical successful scene to imply permission for every business model.
Hypothetical worked scene
In a hypothetical future scenario, a company would ask the relevant partners whether the proposed programme permits an invoice payment to its supplier. If only another destination type is supported, the company would retain a suitable existing route. The example demonstrates a specific eligibility question rather than an unqualified promise of crypto-funded supplier payments.
Make it practical.
Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.References & further reading
Tap Tap Go Journal: publisher and product context ↗Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.
