Keep procurement ahead of routing

Evaluate the supplier, scope, price and delivery terms before choosing how a future payment might be funded. A proposed crypto-to-bank path can be useful for an eligible task, but it should not become the reason to accept unclear commercial terms or overlook an unsuitable recipient. Keep those decisions visible in the record.

Compare practical alternatives

Where several legitimate payment options exist, assess them against the actual obligation and confirmed programme terms. Avoid assuming the hybrid route is always cheaper, faster or better. Tap Tap Go’s crypto-to-bank proposal is coming soon; the eventual service needs to earn its place through fit for the task and customer eligibility.

Imagine this

An illustrative future scenario

Consider a business comparing two production suppliers. It selects the one that meets the agreed quality and delivery needs, then asks which future supported payment route fits that supplier relationship instead of choosing a vendor simply because a new funding story sounds attractive.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.