TAP TAP GO
Write down the operational problem
State what you want to do: spend an existing supported balance, simplify a documented workflow or compare access to a particular payment service. List the required currencies, timing, records and support. Then test the proposed product against those criteria. Avoid letting promotional language about asset growth replace questions about how the card works. A useful payment journey can be described without predicting prices or presenting an operational convenience as an investment return.
Keep separate decisions in separate documents
Maintain one comparison for payment operations and another, with appropriate professional input where needed, for asset exposure, tax or investment considerations. Do not combine a hypothetical transaction saving with an assumed increase in asset value to create an attractive but unsupported overall return. This separation makes discussions with colleagues clearer and prevents a product demonstration from silently changing the purpose of funds that were allocated for a specific business expense or near-term operational requirement.
Hypothetical example
A hypothetical designer already holds a supported asset and wants to understand a spending option. She compares the conversion process, fees and purchase controls without assuming the asset will appreciate. Her decision remains about the payment workflow, while any longer-term asset decision receives a separate review and rationale.
Make it practical.
Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.References & further reading
Background reading — European Supervisory Authorities: crypto-asset consumer warning ↗Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.
