Describe each flow

Identify who pays, what the payment relates to and whether the amount is confirmed, proposed or illustrative. Ask the responsible finance and legal owners how it should be described. Do not assume a proposed territory investment is automatically operating revenue. Keep customer sales, fees, capital contributions and other arrangements distinguishable in the presentation until their treatment has been properly determined.

Use separate tables where helpful

A funding table can describe proposed capital participation while a sales table describes customer activity. Explain the relationship without adding the figures together as though they measure the same thing. Mark conditions and unagreed terms visibly. The editorial goal is transparency about the business model; it does not replace accounting or legal analysis of an arrangement. Readers should know which questions concern funding and which concern commercial performance.

Put the guide to work

Ask the finance owner to review any combined summary page before publication. Even separate tables can become misleading if the closing headline adds unlike amounts together. The summary should preserve the distinction between proposed funding and the operational activity the funding is intended to support.

Imagine this

Hypothetical example

A territory expansion deck adds partner participation amounts to projected card sales and calls the total revenue. The revised version presents the two separately and marks the partner arrangement as proposed, allowing reviewers to assess each part of the model on its own terms.

Make it practical.

Use this checklist as you read. Checks are not stored.

Published by Tap Tap Go. Product availability and eligibility vary by programme and market. About our stories.